Discussing “women in Islam” is a potentially thorny topic,
so I would first like to refer you to my idol, Reza Aslan, who can address the issue
more eloquently than I can:
Cliff notes in case you didn’t watch the video: Islam, like
every religion, is subject to interpretation and there are as many
interpretations of Islam as there are Muslims in the world – more if you count
the interpretations of non-Muslims. What follows is my historical (not theological) interpretation, based on the
interpretations of others. (Mainly Reza Aslan).
Many
Westerners view Islam as monolithically “oppressive to women” – problematic
because no religion or culture is monolithic and ironic for numerous reasons.
Number one: women played an important role in the nascent Ummah (Muslim
community), and were among some of the earliest converts to Islam because
(number two) Islam extended many rights and protections that were denied to
women in pre-Islamic Arabia (not to mention much of Christian Europe).
How better
to discuss the immediate impact of Islam on women, than by investigating the
lives of the women closest to the Prophet: his wives and daughters. In order to
talk about these women, I must also give an overview of some of the generally
accepted facts of the Prophet’s biography.
The Prophet
Muhammad had a highly precarious social position in the tribally-based society
of pre-Islamic Arabia. He was a member of an important tribe (the Quraysh) but
as an orphan his connection to the tribe was tenuous. Still, he managed with
the protection of his uncle to become a moderately successful merchant and
negotiator. As a young man, he gained another important guardian: a wealthy older
widow named Khadija, who first hired Muhammad to manage her affairs, and then
proposed marriage to Muhammad, who accepted. Although Muhammad would later have
polygynous marriages, he was monogamously married to Khadija for twenty-five
years until her death.
Generally,
the role of women is more proscribed in societies in which large amounts of
inheritable property are at stake, especially if property is passed from father
to son – there is much greater motivation for a man to assure the paternity of
his children. Nomadic societies, by their nature, don’t amass nearly as much
property as sedentary societies. So, typically, women in nomadic societies face
fewer restrictions than their sedentary counterparts. (This doesn’t necessarily
make nomadic societies egalitarian.) Among the Bedouin nomads of Muhammad’s
time, women stayed with their father’s clan – not their husbands’ – could
easily divorce their husbands, and polyandry (one woman with multiple husbands)
was practiced alongside polygyny (one man with many wives).
Muhammad,
however, was not a nomad. He lived in the sedentary society of Mecca, where
women could not own or inherit property – with rare exceptions like Khadija –
women could not divorce their husbands, and had no recourse if their husbands
chose to divorce them. Therefore, widows and divorcees were vulnerable in the
tribal structure of Mecca, much as Muhammad, as an orphan, had been.
Muhammad
and Khadija’s relationship was, by all accounts, highly irregular. Khadija had
been twice married and twice widowed before she met Muhammad, who it is
estimated was about 15 years younger than her. For many widows in Meccan
society, re-marriage was an economic necessity: Khadija had not only held onto
her property, but also managed a thriving business. She had no economic motive
to marry again. Muhammad, on the other hand, was facing the prospect of
perpetual bachelorhood because he was not in an economic position to support a
wife and family. Khadija didn’t need a breadwinner, so Muhammad was able to
accept her proposal. Many critics of the Prophet Muhammad focus on his later
polygynous marriages, but as Reza Aslan points out in his book No God But God, in a society where
polygamy was the norm, it is this first monogamous marriage that really should
stand out.
Muhammad’s
revelations began when he was about forty. Khadija was his first follower and
continued to support and protect Muhammad, even when preaching is revelations
got him into hot water with the Quyrash who ruled Mecca. However, when
Muhammad’s protectors – his Uncle and Khadija – died, he and his infant
religious community were in grave danger. With no other options, Muhammad and
his followers – including his daughters – fled to Yathrib, now known as Medina.
While in
Medina, Muhammad began to establish a community run by the rules of his new
religion. Because of the important example that the community in Medina sets
for Muslim life, the flight from Mecca (Hijra) is year one of the Islamic calendar. The ethic of this Ummah (community) was based on social welfare and
taking care of each other, as a reformation of the social inequalities in
Mecca. This included the expansion of certain rights to women: such as the
ability to initiate divorce and the ability to inherit property, which would
not be granted to most Western women until the late 19th and early
20th centuries.
Muhammad’s
ruling on polygyny, however, remains the subject of heated debate. It is
possible to find evidence in the Quran and hadith to both support and reject
the practice, meaning if you want to come away with the understanding that
Islam allows polygyny, you can find evidence to support that conclusion. If you
want to find evidence suggesting that Islam promotes monogamy, you can just as
easily find the evidence.
Allow me demonstrate.
The Quran allows men up to four wives – provided
they can all be treated equally – and after Khadija’s death, Muhammad had nine
simultaneous wives, far exceeding the limit. However, opponents of polygyny
would point out that by allowing only
four wives, the Quran actually limited
the previously unregulated practice of polygyny. Furthermore, the Quran permits
multiple wives only if the husband
can treat them all equally, with the injunction that no matter how one tries it
is impossible to treat multiple wives equally, implying that monogamy is
preferable. As for the prophet’s example: monogamy advocates would point out
that the long monogamous marriage to Khadija was clearly his preference, and
his polygynous marriages in Medina were to cement political alliances.
Like Khadija, Muhammad’s wives in
Medina played an active role in his life and community, from leading prayers,
to going into battle, to helping fund the community (Sawda, one of his wives,
was a gifted leather-maker), to giving Muhammad counsel and debating with him.
The most famous and controversial
of these wives was Aisha, Muhammad’s favorite. The daughter of Muhammad’s
friend and successor, Abu Bakr, Aisha may or may not have been a child when she
married Muhammad (depends on who you ask). She was the only of Muhammad’s wives
to have never been married to anyone else, and to never have had any children
of her own. Although much younger than Muhammad (whether she was a child or
not) Aisha and Muhammad clearly shared a mutual fondness, and hadith show
Aisha’s willingness to challenge, and even play pranks on the Prophet. Because
Aisha was very much Muhammad’s companion during the years in Medina, she is
also the originator of many hadith – stories of things the Prophet said and did
that are used to set an example for Muslims of how to live their lives. Aisha
continued to play an important role in the young Muslim community, even after
Muhammad’s death.
The years after Muhammad’s death
were fractious for the Ummah. When Muhammad died, the prophecy died with him.
Muslims consider him to be a seal on the prophecies of God: there will be no
prophets after Muhammad. However, Muhammad was also the political and spiritual
leader of the community, and left behind no clear instructions about who should
succeed him in this role, leading to a fundamental divide that still exists in
Islam between the Sunni and the Shi’a. Two women found themselves at the center
of this divide: Muhammad’s widow, Aisha, and his daughter, Fatima.
The two women – close in age to
each other – had no love for each other, and have sometimes even been described
as rivals, politically as well as for Muhammad’s affection. The fundamental
split in the community after Muhammad’s death was over whether his successor
should be chosen by the community as whoever was most fit to rule, or if the
leadership should stay within the Prophet’s family. If the successor (or
Caliph) of Muhammad were chosen from among the community, then Aisha’s father –
Abu Bakr – was a strong candidate. (Spoiler alert: Abu Bakr was the first
Caliph.) If, however, leadership stayed in the prophet’s family, then the only
candidate was a man whom Aisha loathed: Muhammad’s cousin and Fatima’s husband,
Ali.
Fatima was the only of Muhammad’s
children to outlive him. All of his sons died in childhood, and all of his
descendants are from Fatima and Ali’s children. Although not as public or
outspoken as Aisha, Fatima insisted that her father had named Ali as his
successor – but Ali was passed over, and Fatima died only six months after her
father.
In the successive years, each time
it was time to choose a new caliph, Aisha campaigned against Ali, and when Ali finally
did become Caliph, Aisha led troops into battle against him.
Many Westerners conflate Islam with
oppression of women, because in some Muslim-majority
countries (*cough Saudi Arabia cough*) Islam is used as a pretense to control
the movements and activities of women. However, Geraldine Brooks in Nine Parts of Desire reminds the reader
that there is nothing inherent in Islam that suggests it must be that way and Reza Aslan notes that many practices deemed
oppressive to women – such as clitorectomy or veiling – are based on local practices
which predate Islam, and have been practiced by Christians and Jews as well.
I’ve gone on quite long enough, so
here’s the bottom line: gender roles and relations are complicated. Religions
are complicated, too. There is no definitive answer about what Muhammad’s vision
was for women in his Ummah, and it is open to interpretation. From where I’m
sitting, it seems to me like he surrounded himself with powerful, inspirational
women, to whom he listened, and to whom he wanted to extend rights and legal
protections. But the jury is out.
It has been for centuries.
Sources: This post started out as pontifications from my
background knowledge about Islam, and then I went back to two somewhat conflicting
books about the topic, so I do not have many specific sources to recommend this
time around.
No God But
God, by Reza Aslan
Nine
Parts of Desire, by Geraldine Brooks (Although she brings up some important
points, I am less enthused by certain parts of her argument.)
Another good source: Who
Speaks for Islam?, by John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed
No comments:
Post a Comment